Masonic Tradition And The Royal Arch - 1
Part 1 of 2
The old distinction between Blue and Red
has almost fallen into desuetude, so far as normal
parlance is concerned, among members of the Craft in
England; but we know that a memorial remains among us in
the colour-symbolism found in the ROYAL ARCH. The Blue
also connotes Symbolical Masonry, and this is a valid
qualification, because the Third Degree opens a door into
a great figurative Mystery as into the blue distance. It
is not of our concern now or we might dwell for a moment
on the significant fact that in Irish Craft workings the
Candidate is told invariably that even the official and
conventional penalties of the Three Degrees are to be
regarded as a part integral of the symbolism which rules
in all. The ROYAL ARCH, or Red Masonry, has passed by its
hypothesis out the symbolical domain: on the surface, at
least, it is dealing no longer with allegory, but with an
actual historical event. According to that version of the
Holy Order which is at work in England and Wales, under
the obedience of the Supreme Grand Chapter, it belongs -
as we are all well aware - to the time of Zerubbabel and
the building of the Second Temple. With certain
variations, which are not essential in character, it is
the same, I believe, in Scotland and the United States. In
Ireland the historical time of the Grade is much later,
being that of Josiah the King, but of this I am unable to
speak except by report, as there are no Rituals available.
There is a sense, however, in which all differences draw
to the same end, for all are concerned with the central
fact of a Secret Tradition, perpetuated by its hypothesis
from an immemorial past, derived originally from sources
behind Masonry and carried from Degrees leading up to the
ROYAL ARCH, through the Holy Order itself and thence into
Christian and some other High Grades.
It is a remarkable fact that on the
surface of the Craft Degrees there is practically no
intimation of this traditional inheritance. The presumable
explanation is that those who constructed the Legend of
the Third Degree, following any vestiges which may have
come into hands of the 18th Century from the
part of York or Scotland, had a mind to follow - a little
roughly and crudely the lines of the Ancient Mysteries
concerning figurative death and resurrection. A signal
confusion followed, for they slew the prototypical Master,
whereas they raised the Candidate, creating a complete
fissure in the logic of symbolism. So it has remained
among us, but something like sixty years after the
approximate date of construction, the Loge de la
Bienfaisance at Lyons, which transmuted the RITE OF THE
STRICT OBSERVANCE, intervened to save the situation, so
far as French Masonry was concerned, and in the Grade of
PERFECT MASTER of St. Andrew they raised Hiram as Christ.
If we pursue the subject of confusion from another point
of departure, we know that - by the hypothesis of the
Third Degree - the Temple of Solomon was left unfinished,
like the legend itself, from which consideration of simple
fact it follows that any completion of the Third Degree
should take up the Hiramic myth at the point where its
story broke off, and lead it to an end in symbolism.
Now we are familiar, and more than
familiar, with the affirmation concerning the ROYAL ARCH,
which is (1) that it is not to be regarded as in any sense
a further Degree superposed upon the Craft, but (2) rather
as a completion of the whole. So far, however, from
concluding the Hiramic myth it leaves unabridged in Ritual
a gap of several centuries, understood as historical time,
and jumps to an examination of certain legendary events
connected with preliminaries to the building of the Second
Temple in the days of Zerubbabel. It follows that the
Third Degree - historically speaking - is a story without
an end, like Canova's German romance, while the ROYAL ARCH
is a prolegomenon to another story, which story is not to
be found in Masonry.
The sense in which the one is
supplementary to the other is a matter of the Secret
Tradition, a formula of loss and recovery, according to
which the Holy Order seeks to elevate the Craft out of a
region of untinctured symbolism to the threshold of Divine
Science. It could have been done in a logical manner,
preserving all the unities, and it so happens that the
necessary elements were ready to the hands of the
symbolists, if we can suppose as I think, is possible -
that certain so-called side grades, or steps, were already
existing in some primitive form. In this case the ROYAL
ARCH has been lifted out of a sequence to which it belongs
essentially, and apart from which its real message is
divided and confused, if it must not be called lost. My
purpose is to collect the links of the broken chain and
then join them up.
If the question be why does the Craft
Candidate pass through a figurative experience which
connotes the idea of death, and then through a shadow of
resurrection, the answer is that the god died and rose in
the Ancient Mysteries, as in the great proto typical
example which is that of Osiris. He was of the Divine
Pantheon, and he returned thereto, as to former companions
at once of toil and attainment. So also Iacchos was torn
to pieces, but again he was restored to life; Tammuz died
and rose; the dead Adonis was given back to the arms of
Venus, even as Persephone to Demeter. If it be asked, on
the other hand, why in the ROYAL ARCH there is a quest
followed ad interiora terra and a discovery consequent
thereon, the answer is that this is precisely the thesis
concerning the preservation of a Secret Tradition, which
descended from Adam, of which Enoch was a notable
custodian, which came down to the time of Solomon and is
carried thereafter through several eloquent memorials of
Masonic Rite. It was not invented by Masonry, and if I
speak here only of the mythos in Israel it is not
peculiar thereto, though it appears under other aspects in
other regions of traditional lore. Before linking up
briefly the chain of Ritual, it is necessary to make a
proviso with respect to the sources.
They are texts of what I am accustomed
to call the Greater Exile of Israel, being that of the
Christian centuries, and they are three in number: (1) The
TALMUD BABLI; (2) The TALMUD HIEROSOLYMAE, and (3) The
SEPHER HA ZOHAR. The last is the latest of all in respect
of time, its final reduction being referred by scholarship
to the 13th Century, though it contains old elements. It
is the great text of the Secret Tradition in Israel, and
this - according to the ZOHAR - began with Adam, for Latin
theology and that which is termed Kabalism meet unawares,
and seem to clasp hands over things appertaining to the
hypothetical state of unfallen man in Paradise. It was in
a state of supernal know ledge, of the science which - by
the theosophical hypothesis - has its root in the Tree of
Life, in the unity of Divine things, not in the duality
and sophistication which is referable to the Tree of
Knowledge. It is said that when the Holy One, blessed be
He, created Adam, He exhorted him to advance in the path
of goodness and revealed to him the Mystery of Wisdom.
Adam contemplated, indeed, all wisdom and all highest
mysteries. He was "encompassed by the glory from on high,"
and was intended in the scheme of divine things to be
united for ever with God, in Whose Image he had been made.
But from the path of the Good and the One - all this
notwithstanding - Adam fell into ways of separation and
abandoned the Tree of Life, meaning the supreme theosophy
of the inward Secret Doctrine. The penalty of this
separation is described under the term death in the text
of Genesis.
By the hypothesis of the ZOHAR, the
Secret Doctrine, the Supreme Wisdom, in a word, that
Hidden Treasure which was transmitted in perpetuity
thereafter as a tradition through the ages, was
communicated to the First Man by means of a book, which
came down from heaven in the hands of the angel Raziel,
and was delivered to Adam, the messenger in question being
denominated Chief of Supreme Mysteries. It remained in the
possession of Adam till he was driven out of the Garden,
when it was ravished out of his hands. But as it is
obvious that there could have been no Secret Tradition -
such as was conceived by the mind of Israel - unless its
depository were restored, so we hear in due course that in
answer to his tears and entreaties it was given back in
the end to our progenitor by the angel Raphael. Adam
transmitted it to Seth, from whom it passed to Enoch,
who, after he was taken by God became the great angel
Metatron, the Angel of the Presence and Chief of the
Celestial School. It is said that the School of Metatron
is the School of the Holy One, and that in his hands are
the Keys of Heaven. It came about for these reasons that
the Secret Book is called the BOOK OF ENOCH, though it
passed down ultimately to Abraham. Thereafter the ZOHAR is
silent regarding its travels and whereabouts, but the
Secret Tradition of which it is the source was
communicated to the elders by Moses and thence, in the
myth concerning it, through succeeding generations to the
doctors of the Zoharic school, the chief repository at the
time of the fall of Jerusalem being Rabbi Simeon ben
Yochai.
From Zoharic Kabalism the tradition
descended to the follies and iniquities of Jewish
Ceremonial Magic, and so it comes about that in these
dregs and lees there is a BOOK OF RAZIEL, which is a book
of Divine Names and Conjurations based thereon. It is a
favourable specimen of its class, in comparison with Keys
of Solomon, texts of Goetia, Sworn Books of Honorius and
things under the generic title of Grimoires; but it
presents a corrupted form of the tradition concerning
Enoch. Antecedent to the ZOHAR, as I have intimated, are
certain Talmudic fables, which exceed the scope of this
notice. Antecedent to both are Josephus and a
comparatively ancient apocrypha of the apocalyptic class
under the name of the BOOK OF ENOCH. To Josephus we owe
the well-known myth concerning the Pillars of Stone and
Brick, on which Enoch inscribed the Mysteries of Knowledge
belonging to the age before the Flood: there are many
variations of the legend, which concerns broadly the
perpetuation of the Secret Tradition. It is not otherwise
to our purpose. But the BOOK OF ENOCH, which is a series
of visions beheld by the prophet when he was in the
spirit, like the seer of Patmos, is a prototype of Masonic
tradition and that especially which is reflected into the
ROYAL ARCH. It is said that GOD shewed Enoch nine vaults
in a vision, and that with the assistance of Methuselah
his son, he proceeded to erect in the bosom of the
mountain of Canaan a secret sanctuary, on the plan of what
he had beheld, being vaults beneath one another.
In the ninth, or undermost vault, Enoch
placed a triangle of purest gold, on which he had
inscribed that which was presumably the heart, essence and
centre of the Secret Tradition, the True Name of God,
comprehending all grace, all power and the providence of
Divine Mercy. It is the development of this legend which
can be followed through several Grades and various Rites
of Masonry, the root of all therein being referable to the
Traditional History in the Third Craft Degree. We know
that which it was attempted to wrest by violence from the
keeping of the Master Builder: we know what he died to
preserve inviolable, and though in reality it did not
perish with him - because there were other Keepers - we
know that Masonry suffered a loss through the centuries,
and is represented as in the quest of its discovery in the
Opening and Closing of the Lodge in the Master Grade. We
know in fine what substitutes were accepted as distinctive
tests, to prevail everywhere, until in some manner as yet
unknown the term of quest should be reached and the pearl
of great price restored. When Moses, Aholiab and Bezaleel
sat in the Holy Lodge, at the foot of Mount Horeb, during
the long wanderings of Israel in the desert of Sinai, by
the great hypothesis of the tradition, they were in
plenary possession of all the Masonic treasures.
E. A. WAITE
When Solomon and others of the
triad, who ruled the Sacred Lodge, sat on Mount Moriah,
it was still as if the sun were at its meridian, a
noon-tide glory of Masonry. But a change came over, by
which the triad was broken and the light of the Art was
obscured. It seems to me that in the deeper understanding
our Craft Lodges are a memorial of this original loss: it
is a logical inference from all that we are told in the
story and from that which we claim to seek; for it is with
us as it was with those Brethren of old, who, after the
passing of the Master-Builder, agreed - till they could do
better - to be content with things casual, though they
desired things essential, and with accidents in place of
the noumenal. It is as if, having heard and followed a
great call, and been long on the quest of God, it came
about that - for want of a term - we had to rest satisfied
with His image, or with unconsecrated Bread and Wine in
place of the Higher Eucharist and the Holy Grail.
Freemasonry is founded on the immutable laws of Truth and
Justice and its grand object is to promote the happiness
of the human race.
WASHINGTON
|